The impact of hospital size on national trends and outcomes in isolated open proximal aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of hospital size on national trend estimates of isolated open proximal aortic surgery for benchmarking hospital performance. METHODS: Patients age >18 years who underwent isolated open proximal aortic surgery for aneurysm and dissection from 2002 to 2014 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Concomitant valvular, vessel revascularization, re-do procedures, endovascular, and surgery for descending and thoracoabdominal aorta were excluded. Discharges were stratified by hospital size and analyzed using trend, multivariable regression, propensity-score matching analysis. RESULTS: Over a 13-year period, 53,657 isolated open proximal aortic operations were performed nationally. Although the total number of operations/year increased (∼2.9%/year increase) and overall in-hospital mortality decreased (∼4%/year; both P < .001 for trend), these did not differ by hospital size (P > .05). Large hospitals treated more sicker and older patients but had shorter length of stay and lower hospital costs (both P < .001). Even after propensity-score matching, large hospital continued to demonstrate superior in-hospital outcomes, although only statistically for major in-hospital cardiac complications compared with non-large hospitals. In our subgroup analysis of dissection versus non-dissection cohort, in-hospital mortality trends decreased only in the non-dissection cohort (P < .01) versus dissection cohort (P = .39), driven primarily by the impact of large hospitals (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates increasing volume and improving outcomes of isolated open proximal aortic surgeries nationally over the last decade regardless of hospital bed size. Moreover, the resource allocation of sicker patients to larger hospital resulted shorter length of stay and hospital costs, while maintaining similar operative mortality to small- and medium-sized hospitals.

The evolving role of endovascular therapy in the management of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Over the past two decades, vascular surgeons have successfully incorporated endovascular techniques to the routine care of patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (ATOS). However, no reports have documented the impact of endovascular therapy. This study describes the trends in management of ATOS by vascular surgeons and outcomes after both endovascular and open repair of the subclavian artery. METHODS: We queried a single-institution, prospectively maintained thoracic outlet syndrome database for ATOS cases managed by vascular surgeons. For comparison, cases were divided into two equal time periods, January 1986 to August 2003 (P-1) vs September 2003 to March 2021 (P-2), and by treatment modality, open vs endovascular. Clinical presentation, outcomes, and the involvement of vascular surgeons in endovascular therapy were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 2200 thoracic outlet syndrome cases, 51 were ATOS (27 P-1, 24 P-2) and underwent 50 transaxillary decompressive operations. Forty-eight cases (92%) presented with ischemic symptoms. Thrombolysis was done in 15 (29%). During P-1, vascular surgeons performed none of the catheter-based interventions. During P-2, vascular surgeons performed 60% of the angiograms, 50% of thrombolysis, and 100% of stent grafting. Subclavian artery pathology included 16 aneurysms (31%), 15 stenoses (29%), and 19 occlusions (37%). Compared with open aneurysmal repair, endovascular stent graft repairs took less time (241 vs 330 minutes; P = .09), incurred lower estimated blood loss (103 vs 150 mL; P = .36), and had a shorter length of stay (2.4 vs 5.0 days; P = .10). Yet the endovascular group had decreased primary (63% vs 77%; P = .481), primary assisted (75% vs 85%; P = .590), and secondary patency rates (88% vs 92%; P = .719), at a mean follow-up time of 3.0 years for the endovascular group and 6.9 years for the open group (P = .324). These differences did not achieve statistical significance. Functionally, 84% of patients were able to resume work or school. A majority of patients (88%) had a good to excellent functional outcome based on their Derkash score. Somatic pain scores and QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) scores decreased postoperatively, 2.9 vs 0.8 (P = .015) and 42.6 vs 12.6 (P = .004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the evolving role of endovascular management of ATOS over the past two decades and documents the expanded role of vascular surgeons in the endovascular management of ATOS at a single institution. Compared with open repair, stent graft repair of the subclavian artery may be associated with shorter operative times, less blood loss, but decreased patency, without changes in long-term functional outcomes.

Thresholds for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Canada and United States.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated significant geographic variations in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) despite standard guidelines. Differences in patient selection, operative technique, and outcomes for AAA repair in Canada versus United States were assessed. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was used to identify all patients who underwent elective endovascular or open AAA repair between 2010 and 2019 in Canada and the United States. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were recorded and differences between countries were assessed using independent t test and χ2 test. The primary outcome was the percentage of AAA repaired below recommended diameter thresholds (men, <5.5 cm; women, <5.0 cm). The secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Associations between region and outcomes were assessed using univariate/multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: There were 51,455 U.S. patients and 1451 Canadian patients who underwent AAA repair in Vascular Quality Initiative sites during the study period. There was a higher proportion of endovascular repairs in the United States (83.7% vs 68.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-2.63; P < .001). U.S. patients had more comorbidities, including hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and prior revascularization. The percentage of AAA repaired below recommended thresholds was significantly higher in the United States (38.8% vs 15.2%; OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.03-4.17; P < .001). This difference persisted after controlling for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 2.63-4.17; P < .001). Factors that predicted AAA repair below recommended thresholds were U.S. region (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.03-4.17), male sex (adjusted OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.72-3.07), and endovascular repair (adjusted OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.95-2.21). The in-hospital mortality rate was low (1.0% vs 0.8%) and the 1-year rate mortality was similar between countries (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70-1.31; P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant variations in AAA management between Canada and the United States. A greater proportion of U.S. patients underwent AAA repair below the recommended diameter thresholds. This finding is partly driven by a higher percentage of endovascular repairs. Despite these differences, the perioperative and 1-year mortality rates are similar. Future studies should investigate reasons for these variations and quality improvement projects are needed to standardize care.

Trends in the use of cerebrospinal drains and outcomes related to spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair and complex endovascular aortic repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a dreaded complication of thoracic and complex endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/cEVAR). Controversy exists surrounding cerebrospinal fluid drain (CSFD) use, especially preoperative prophylactic placement, owing to concerns regarding catheter-related complications. However, these risks are balanced by the widely accepted benefits of CSFDs during open repair to prevent and/or rescue patients with SCI. The importance of this issue is underscored by the paucity of data on CSFD practice patterns, limiting the development of practice guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of the present analysis was to evaluate the differences between patients who developed SCI despite preoperative CSFD placement and those treated with therapeutic postoperative CSFD placement. METHODS: All elective TEVAR/cEVAR procedures for degenerative aneurysm pathology in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed. CSFD use over time, the factors associated with preoperative prophylactic vs postoperative therapeutic CSFD placement in patients with SCI (transient or permanent), and outcomes were evaluated. Survival differences were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 3406 TEVAR/cEVAR procedures met the inclusion criteria, with an overall SCI rate of 2.3% (n = 88). The SCI rate decreased from 4.55% in 2014 to 1.43% in 2018. Prophylactic preoperative CSFD use was similar over time (2014, 30%; vs 2018, 27%; P = .8). After further exclusions to evaluate CSFD use in those who had developed SCI, 72 patients were available for analysis, 48 with SCI and prophylactic CSFD placement and 24 with SCI and therapeutic CSFD placement. Specific to SCI, the patient demographics and comorbidities were not significantly different between the prophylactic and therapeutic groups, with the exception of previous aortic surgery, which was more common in the prophylactic CSFD cohort (46% vs 23%; P < .001). The SCI outcome was significantly worse for the therapeutic group because 79% had documented permanent paraplegia at discharge compared with 54% of the prophylactic group (P = .04). SCI patients receiving a postoperative therapeutic CSFD had had worse survival than those with a preoperative prophylactic CSFD (50% ± 10% vs 71% ± 9%; log-rank P = .1; Wilcoxon P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CSFD use with TEVAR/cEVAR remained stable during the study period. Of the SCI patients, postoperative therapeutic CSFD placement was associated with worse sustained neurologic outcomes and overall survival compared with preoperative prophylactic CSFD placement. These findings highlight the need for a randomized clinical trial to examine prophylactic vs therapeutic CSFD placement in association with TEVAR/cEVAR.

Association between hospital volume and failure-to-rescue for open repairs of juxtarenal aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: A nationwide variation in mortality stratified by hospital volume exists after open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). In the present study, we assessed whether the rates of postoperative complications or failure-to-rescue (defined as death after a major postoperative complication) would better explain the lower mortality rates among higher volume hospitals. METHODS: Using the 2004 to 2018 Vascular Quality Initiative database, we identified all patients who had undergone open repair of elective or symptomatic AAAs, in which the proximal clamp sites were at least above one renal artery. We divided the patients into hospital quintiles according to the annual hospital volume and compared the risk-adjusted outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient characteristics, operative factors, and hospital volume, was used to evaluate three outcomes: 30-day mortality, overall complications, and failure-to-rescue. RESULTS: We identified 3566 patients who had undergone open repair of elective or symptomatic complex AAAs (median age, 71 years; 29% women; 4.1% black; 48% Medicare insurance). The unadjusted rates of 30-day postoperative mortality, overall complications, and failure-to-rescue were 5.0%, 44%, and 10%, respectively. Common complications included renal dysfunction (25%), cardiac dysrhythmia (14%), and pneumonia (14%), with the specific failure-to-rescue rate ranging from 12% to 22%. On adjusted analysis, the risk-adjusted mortality rate was 2.5 times greater for the lower volume hospitals relative to the higher volume hospitals (7.4% vs 3.0%; P < .01). Although the risk-adjusted complication rates were similar between these hospital groups (30% vs 27%; P = .06), the failure-to-rescue rate was 2.3 times greater for the lower volume hospitals relative to the higher volume hospitals (6.3% vs 2.7%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Higher volume hospitals had lower mortality rates after open repair of complex AAAs because they were better at the "rescue" of patients after the occurrence of postoperative complications. Both an understanding of the clinical mechanisms underlying this association and the regionalization of open repair might improve patient outcomes.

Epidemiology of endovascular and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States from 2004 to 2015 and implications for screening.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary national trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and intact AAAs are relatively unknown. Furthermore, screening is only covered by insurance for patients aged 65 to 75 years with a family history of AAAs and for men with a positive smoking history. It is unclear what proportion of patients who present with a ruptured AAA would have been candidates for screening. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2015, we identified ruptured and intact AAA admissions and repairs using the International Classification of Diseases codes. We generated the screening-eligible cohort using previously identified proportions of male smokers (87%) and all patients with a family history of AAAs (10%) and applied these proportions to patients aged 65 to 75 years. We accounted for those who could have had a previous AAA diagnosis (17%), either from screening or an incidental detection in patients aged >75 years who had presented with AAA rupture. The primary outcomes were treatment and in-hospital mortality between patients meeting the criteria for screening vs those who did not. RESULTS: We evaluated 65,125 admissions for ruptured AAAs and 461,191 repairs for intact AAAs. Overall, an estimated 45,037 admitted patients (68%) and 25,777 patients who had undergone repair for ruptured AAAs (59%) did not meet the criteria for screening. Of the patients who did not qualify, 27,653 (63%) were aged >75 years, 10,603 (24%) were aged <65 years, and 16,103 (36%) were women. Endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) increased for ruptured AAAs from 10% in 2004 to 55% in 2015 (P < .001), with operative mortality of 35%. EVAR increased for intact AAAs from 45% in 2004 to 83% in 2015 (P < .001), with operative mortality of 2.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who had undergone repair for ruptured AAAs did not qualify for screening. EVAR was the primary treatment of both ruptured and intact AAAs with relatively low in-hospital mortality. Therefore, expansion of the screening criteria to include selected women and a wider age range should be considered.

A systematic review of the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on survival in aortic, thoracic and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is becoming a mainstay in vascular surgery, both in metropolitan and regional hospitals. This review aims to assess the impact of hospital and surgeon volume on perioperative mortality specific to this surgery type to support the use of this treatment modality extensively. METHODS: A literature search was performed on multiple dedicated medical databases using a detailed search strategy with terms focusing on hospital volume and EVARs. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen and evaluate suitable sources, focusing on operators and hospitals performing EVARs and the morbidity/mortality as outcomes. The results were then appraised using a PRISMA framework. RESULTS: We reviewed 45 articles. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria for complete review. There was no level 1 evidence, and only a single systematic review and meta-analysis. EVAR and thoracic EVAR perioperative mortality had no correlation with hospital volume. Limited evidence was presented for fenestrated EVAR, where a mortality risk based on hospital volume remains unanswered. Open procedures for aneurysm repair had perioperative mortality outcomes that grossly correlated with hospital volume, supporting their use in high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: With open aneurysm repairs having an increased mortality risk in low-volume centers, and endovascular treatment options gaining momentum, there is considerable support for the use of EVAR and thoracic EVAR in smaller regional centers safely and effectively. There is very limited evidence in the use of fenestrated EVAR, which remains unanswered, but presents a significant opportunity for research.

Impact of Gradual Adoption of EVAR in Elective Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Retrospective Cohort Study from 2009 to 2015.

INTRODUCTION: The recommendations about the preferred type of elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) still divides guidelines committees, even nowadays. The aim is to assess outcomes after AAA repair focusing on differences between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: The observational retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients submitted to elective AAA repair at a tertiary center, 2009-2015. Exclusion criteria were as follows: nonelective cases or complex aortic aneurysms. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and vascular reintervention. Time trends were assessed along the period under analysis. RESULTS: From a total of 211 included patients, those submitted to EVAR were older (74 ± 7 vs. 67 ± 9 years; P < 0.001), presented a higher prevalence of hypertension (83.5% vs. 68.5%, P = 0.004), obesity (28.7% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.029), previous cardiac revascularization (30.5% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.005), heart failure (17.2% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.013), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (32.8% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.002). Patients were followed during a median of 49 months. EVAR resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (median 4 and interquartile range 3 vs. 8 (9); P < 0.001), lower 30-day complications (10.6% vs. 22.8%, P = 0.017), lower aortic-related mortality, and similar reintervention after adjustment with a propensity score. Along the time under analysis, EVAR became the predominate type of repair (P = 0.024), the proportion of complications decreased (P = 0.014), and the 30-day mortality (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Although EVAR was offered to patients with more comorbidities, better and durable outcomes were achieved after EVAR, favoring its adoption for elective AAA repair.

Endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide in cerebrospinal fluid and early quality of life and mental health after good-grade spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage-a feasibility series.

The vasodilatory calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is excessively released after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH) and modulates psycho-behavioral function. In this pilot study, we prospectively analyzed the treatment-specific differences in the secretion of endogenous CGRP into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the acute stage after good-grade sSAH and its impact on self-reported health-related quality of life (hrQoL). Twenty-six consecutive patients (f:m = 13:8; mean age 50.6 years) with good-grade sSAH were enrolled (drop out 19% (n = 5)): 35% (n = 9) underwent endovascular aneurysm occlusion, 23% (n = 6) microsurgery, and 23% (n = 6) of the patients with perimesencephalic SAH received standardized intensive medical care. An external ventricular drain was inserted within 72 h after the onset of bleeding. CSF was drawn daily from day 1-10. CGRP levels were determined via competitive enzyme immunoassay and calculated as "area under the curve" (AUC). All patients underwent a hrQoL self-report assessment (36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), ICD-10-Symptom-Rating questionnaire (ISR)) after the onset of sSAH (t1: day 11-35) and at the 6-month follow-up (t2). AUC CGRP (total mean ± SD, 5.7 ± 1.8 ng/ml/24 h) was excessively released into CSF after sSAH. AUC CGRP levels did not differ significantly when dichotomizing the aSAH (5.63 ± 1.77) and pSAH group (5.68 ± 2.08). aSAH patients revealed a higher symptom burden in the ISR supplementary item score (p = 0.021). Multiple logistic regression analyses corroborated increased mean levels of AUC CGRP in CSF at t1 as an independent prognostic factor for a significantly higher symptom burden in most ISR scores (compulsive-obsessive syndrome (OR 5.741, p = 0.018), anxiety (OR 7.748, p = 0.021), depression (OR 2.740, p = 0.005), the supplementary items (OR 2.392, p = 0.004)) and for a poorer performance in the SF-36 physical component summary score (OR 0.177, p = 0.001). In contrast, at t2, CSF AUC CGRP concentrations no longer correlated with hrQoL. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to correlate the levels of endogenous CSF CGRP with hrQoL outcome in good-grade sSAH patients. Excessive CGRP release into CSF may have a negative short-term impact on hrQoL and emotional health like anxiety and depression. While subacutely after sSAH, higher CSF levels of the vasodilator CGRP are supposed to be protective against vasospasm-associated cerebral ischemia, from a psychopathological point of view, our results suggest an involvement of CSF CGRP in the dysregulation of higher integrated behavior.

Diagnostic impact of monitoring transcranial motor-evoked potentials to prevent ischemic complications during endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms.

The present study aimed to determine the incidence of intraprocedural motor-evoked potential (MEP) changes and to correlate them with intraprocedural ischemic complications and postprocedural neurological deficits in patients after endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment. This study analyzed data from 164 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular coil embolization to treat intracranial aneurysms under transcranial MEP monitoring. We analyzed associations between significant changes in MEP defined as > 50% decrease in amplitude, and intraprocedural complications as well as postoperative neurological deficits. Factors associated with postprocedural neurological deficits were also assessed. The treated aneurysms were predominantly located in the anterior circulation (71%). Fourteen (9%) were located at perforators or branches that supplied the pyramidal tract. Intraprocedural complications developed in eight (5%) patients, and four of eight (50%) patients occurred postprocedural neurological deficits. Significant intraprocedural MEP changes occurred during seven of eight endovascular procedures associated with intraprocedural complications and salvage procedures were performed immediately. Among these changes, four transient MEP changes, recovered within 10 min, were not associated with postprocedural neurological deficits, whereas three permanent MEP changes were associated with postprocedural neurological deficits and mRS ≥ 1 at discharge. Aneurysms located at perforators/branches supplying the pyramidal tract, and permanent intraprocedural MEP changes were associated with postprocedural neurological deficits. We conclude that intraprocedural transcranial MEP monitoring can reliably identify ischemic changes and can initiate prompt salvage procedures during endovascular aneurysm treatment.

Timing of repair of blunt thoracic aortic injuries in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair era.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the preferred operative treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs). Its use is associated with improved outcomes compared with open surgical repair and nonoperative management. However, the optimal time from injury to repair is unknown and remains a subject of debate across different societal practice guidelines. The purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in the management of BTAI, with a specific focus on the impact of timing of repair on outcomes. METHODS: Using the National Trauma Data Bank, we identified adult patients with BTAI between 2012 and 2017. Patients with prehospital or emergency department cardiac arrest or incomplete data sets were excluded from analysis. Patients were classified according to timing of repair: group 1, <24 hours; and group 2, ≥24 hours. The primary outcome evaluated was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included overall hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The analysis was completed for 2821 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI with known operative times. The overall mortality in the patient cohort was 8.4% (238/2821); 75% of patients undergoing TEVAR were repaired within 24 hours. Mortality was more than twofold greater in group 1 compared with group 2 (9.8% [207/2118] vs 4.4% [31/703]; P = .001). This mortality benefit persisted across injury severity groups and was independent of the presence of serious extrathoracic injuries. Logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age ≥65 years, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8, systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg at admission, and serious extrathoracic injuries, showed a higher adjusted mortality in group 1 (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.91; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with BTAI undergo endovascular repair within 24 hours of injury. Patients undergoing delayed repair have improved survival compared with those repaired within the first 24 hours of injury in spite of similar injury patterns and severity. In patients with BTAIs without signs of imminent rupture, delaying endovascular repair beyond 24 hours after injury should be considered.

Regional Market Competition is Associated with Aneurysm Diameter at the Time of EVAR.

BACKGROUND: Local market competition has been previously associated with more aggressive surgical decision-making. For example, more local competition for organs is associated with acceptance of lower quality kidney offers in transplant surgery. We hypothesized that market competition would be associated with the size of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at the time of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: We included all elective EVARs reported in the Vascular Quality Initiative database (2012-2018). Small AAAs were defined as a maximum diameter <5.5 cm in men or <5.0 cm in women. We calculated the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), a measure of physician market concentration (higher HHI = less market competition), for each US census region. Multilevel regression was used to examine the association between the size of AAA at EVAR and HHI, clustering by region. RESULTS: Of 37,914 EVARs performed, 15,379 (40.6%) were for small AAAs. There was significant variation in proportion of EVARs performed for small AAAs across regions (P < 0.001). The South had both the highest proportion of EVARs for small AAAs (44.2%) as well as the highest market competition (HHI 50), whereas the West had the lowest proportion of EVARs for small AAAs (35.0%) and the lowest market competition (HHI 107). Adjusting for patient characteristics, each 10 unit increase in HHI was associated with a 0.1 mm larger maximum AAA diameter at the time of EVAR (95% CI 0.04-0.24 mm, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Physician market concentration is independently associated with AAA diameter at time of elective EVAR. These data suggest that physician decision-making for EVAR is impacted by market competition.

Trends and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with open concomitant cervical debranching.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the most common surgical procedure for treatment of descending thoracic aortic pathology. Cervical debranching in the form of carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition (CSBT) and carotid-carotid bypass (CCB) has enabled the use of TEVAR for the treatment of more complex anatomy involving the arch. The present study examined the effects of concomitant cervical bypass on the perioperative outcomes of TEVAR. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files (2005-2017) were reviewed. Using the Current Procedural Terminology codes, all patients who had undergone TEVAR were identified and were divided into three groups: TEVAR, TEVAR with one bypass (CSBT or CCB), and TEVAR with two bypasses (CSBT and CCB). The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of the three groups were compared. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3281 patients had undergone TEVAR and 10% had also undergone one or more debranching procedure (one bypass, 9%; two bypasses, 1%). The frequency of debranching had increased from 3.4% to 10.9% (P = .01) during the study period. Significant differences were found among the three groups in age, sex, smoking history, urgency of surgery, and anesthesia technique. The patients who had undergone TEVAR with cervical debranching had had significantly greater morbidity, longer operating times, and longer hospital stays compared with those who had undergone TEVAR alone. The mortality of TEVAR with two bypasses (22.6%) was significantly greater than that of TEVAR alone (7.5%) and TEVAR with one bypass (6.8%; P < .01). The total morbidity (30.9% vs 35.1% vs 67.7%; P < .001) and stroke rate (3% vs 7.5% vs 12.9%; P < .0001) increased with the increasing number of bypasses. A subgroup analysis of patients who had undergone TEVAR with one bypass showed no significant differences in mortality between TEVAR plus CSBT (6.6%) vs TEVAR plus CCB (8.8%; P = .63). Multivariable analysis showed that TEVAR with two bypasses was associated with significantly increased mortality compared with TEVAR alone (odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-10.73) and TEVAR with one bypass (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.24-9.51). Older age (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42-2.13), dependent functional status (OR, 1.48; 1.00-2.19), dialysis (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.57-4.33), and emergent status (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.73-4.90) were also associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR with concomitant cervical debranching has been increasingly used to treat complex aortic pathology but is associated with significantly worse outcomes than TEVAR alone. As advanced endovascular technology to treat the aortic arch emerges, the outcomes of open surgical debranching in the present study constitute an important benchmark for comparison.

Improved outcomes of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic injuries at higher volume institutions.

BACKGROUND: The use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has significantly improved the ability to treat traumatic aortic injuries (tTEVAR). We sought to determine whether a greater center volume correlated with better outcomes. METHODS: Vascular Quality Initiative data of TEVAR (2011-2017) for trauma were used in the present analysis. Using the distribution of the annual case volume at the participating centers, the sample was stratified into three terciles. In-hospital mortality at high-volume centers (HVCs) and low-volume centers (LVCs) was compared after adjustment for risk factors established in our previous Vascular Quality Initiative-based risk model containing age, gender, renal impairment, left subclavian artery involvement, and select concomitant injuries. RESULTS: A total of 619 tTEVAR cases were studied across 74 centers. HVCs (n = 184 cases) had performed ≥4.9 cases annually and LVCs (n = 220 cases) had performed ≤2.4 cases annually. Both crude mortality (4.4% vs 8.6%; P = .22) and adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.09; P = .08) showed a trend toward better outcomes for tTEVAR performed at HVCs than at LVCs. The addition of center volume to our previous multivariate model significantly improved its discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.90 vs 0.88; P = .02). The overall TEVAR volume (for all indications) was not associated with increased odds of mortality for tTEVAR (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-1.20; P = .11), nor did it improve the model's discriminative ability. CONCLUSIONS: Higher volume centers showed improved perioperative mortality after tTEVAR. The thoracic aortic trauma volume was more predictive than the overall TEVAR volume, suggesting that technical expertise is not the driving factor. Stable patients might benefit from transfer to a higher volume center before repair.

Increasing disparity between Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE: The current Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines, based on randomized controlled trials published more than a decade ago, recommend a minimum threshold diameter of 5.5 cm for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) repair. It is unknown whether practice patterns with respect to size of repair have changed since the publication of these guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the real-world practice of vascular surgeons in our region with respect to iAAA size at the time of repair, whether this has changed over the past 12 years and if any changes were associated with the repair type, open vs endovascular. METHODS: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) database was used to identify all patients who received iAAA repair between 2003 and 2015. The primary end point was to quantify the annual percentage of iAAAs repaired in different size categories (≥5.5 cm; <5.5 cm but ≥5.0 cm; <5.0 cm) over the study time period and by type of repair. The secondary end points were morbidity and mortality in these groups. We excluded nonelective cases (ruptured or symptomatic), patients with coexisting iliac artery aneurysms, and those missing critical data. RESULTS: A total of 5314 patients with iAAA repairs (1538 open, 3776 endovascular) were identified in the VSGNE database during the study period. In 40% (2110 of 5314) of patients, repair was performed for aneurysms <5.5 cm, with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) comprising 75% (1581 of 2110) and open 25% (529 of 2110). More EVARs were performed for <5.5 cm in 2015 (46%) compared with 2003 (33%) (P < .05, n - 1 χ2) with an average increase of 1.1%/y. There was also a non-statistically significant increase in open repair of small aneurysms (0.7%/y; P = .759). Overall, 30-day mortality was 1.11% in the EVAR group (0.54% in <5.0 cm, 0.91% in ≥5.0 but <5.5 cm, and 1.55% in ≥5.5 cm), compared with 3% in the open group (2.88%, 1.79%, and 3.77%, respectively) with no significant change in mortality in either group over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the SVS guidelines suggesting surveillance rather than repair of iAAA <5.5 cm, an increasing proportion of repairs in the VSGNE database were performed below that threshold. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial and might include a lesser complexity and lower operative mortality for smaller aneurysms and markedly improved third- and fourth-generation stent graft technology with possibly better long-term survival. As such, it may be time to re-examine the current guidelines for iAAA repair.

National temporal trends and determinants of cost of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades, there has been a shift in the management of aortic abdominal aneurysm from open intervention (open aortic aneurysm repair) to an endovascular approach (endovascular aortic aneurysm repair). This shift has yielded clinical as well as socioeconomic reverberations. In our current study, we aim to analyze these effects brought about by the switch to endovascular treatment and to scrutinize the determinants of cost variations between the two treatment modalities. METHODS: The National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database was queried for clinical data ranging from 2001 to 2013 using International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes for open and endovascular aortic repair. Clinical parameters and financial data related to the two treatment modalities were analyzed. Temporal trends of index hospitalization costs were determined. Multivariate linear regression was used to characterize determinants of cost for endovascular aneurysm repair and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. RESULTS: A total of 128,154 aortic repairs were captured in our analysis, including 62,871 open repairs and 65,283 endovascular repairs. Over the assessed time period, there has been a decrease in the cost of elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from $34,975.62 to $31,384.90, a $3,590.72 difference (p < 0.01), while the cost of open aortic repair has increased from $37,427.77 to $43,640.79 by 2013, a $6,212.79 increase (p < 0.01). The cost of open aortic aneurysm repair disproportionately increased at urban teaching hospitals, where by 2013, it costs $50,205.59, compared to $34,676.46 at urban nonteaching hospitals, and $34,696.97 at rural institutions. Urban teaching hospitals were found to perform an increasing proportion of complex open aneurysm repairs, involving concomitant renal and visceral bypass procedures. On multivariate analysis, strong determinants of cost increase for both endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and open aortic aneurysm repair are rupture status, prolonged length of stay, occurrence of complications, and the need for disposition to a nursing facility or another acute care institution. CONCLUSION: As the vascular community has shifted from an open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm to an endovascular approach, a number of unforeseen clinical and economic effects were noted. We have characterized these ramifications to help guide further clinical decision and resource allocation.

Examination of race and infrainguinal bypass conduit use in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Vein conduit is known to have better patency than prosthetic for infrainguinal bypass. Here we explore if racial disparities exist in infrainguinal bypass vein conduit use amid preoperative patient and systemic factors. METHODS: Retrospective Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative data for 23,959 infrainguinal bypasses between 2003 and 2017 for occlusive disease were analyzed. For homogeneity, only infrainguinal bypasses originating from the common femoral artery were included. Demographics of patients receiving vein vs prosthetic were compared and logistic regression analyses were performed with race and preoperative factors to evaluate for predictors of vein conduit use. RESULTS: Adjusted regression models demonstrated black patients were 76% as likely (p < .001) and Hispanic patients 79% as likely (p = .003) to have vein conduit compared to white patients. Factors positively correlating with vein use included vein mapping, more distal bypass target, tissue loss or acute ischemia bypass indications, commercial insurance, and weight. Factors against vein use included advanced age, female gender, ASA class 4, urgent procedure, preoperative mobility limitation, prior CABG or leg bypass, prior smoking, preoperative anticoagulation, and a bypass performed in the Southern US or before 2012. While black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive vein, they were vein mapped at similar or higher rates than other groups. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities exist in conduit use for infrainguinal bypass, with black and Hispanic patients less likely to receive vein bypasses. However, the contribution of race to conduit selection is small in adjusted and unadjusted models. Overall, pre-operative variables in the Vascular Quality Initiative poorly predicted vein conduit use for infrainguinal bypass.

The evolution of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of and indications for open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have evolved over time. We evaluated these trends through the experience at a tertiary care academic center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing open AAA repair (inclusive of type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms) from 2005 to 2018 at an academic institution. Trends over time were evaluated using the Spearman test; Cox regression was used to determine predictors of mortality and to generate adjusted survival curves. RESULTS: There were 628 patients (71.5% male; 88.2% white) with a mean age of 70.5 ± 9.4 years who underwent open AAA repair with a mean aneurysm diameter of 6.2 ± 1.5 cm. The median length of stay was 10 days, and the median intensive care unit length of stay was 3 days. Urgent repair was undertaken in 21.1%; 22.3% were type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, and 9.9% were performed for explantation. Our series favored a retroperitoneal approach in the majority of cases (82.5%). The proximal clamp sites were supraceliac (46.1%), suprarenal (29.1%), and infrarenal (24.8%), with approximately a third requiring renal artery reimplantation. The average cross-clamp time was 25.5 ± 14.9 minutes; the mean renal ischemia time for supraceliac and suprarenal clamp sites was 28.4 ± 12.3 minutes and 23.5 ± 12.7 minutes, respectively. Postoperative renal dysfunction occurred in 19.6% of the overall cohort, with 6.2% requiring hemodialysis. Of those requiring postoperative hemodialysis, the majority (75%) received an urgent repair. The in-hospital mortality was 2.3% for elective cases vs 20.9% for urgent repair, and 29.8% of patients were discharged to rehabilitation, with an overall 30-day readmission rate of 7.9%. Over time, there were trends of increased aneurysm repair complexity, with decreasing infrarenal clamp sites, increasing supraceliac clamp sites, increasing proportion of explantations, and increasing need for bifurcated grafts. The acuity of aneurysm repair likewise changed, with the proportion of urgent repairs increasing over time, largely attributable to the rise in explantations. Clamp site influenced the frequency of perioperative complications. Urgent repairs and age at operation were associated with mortality, whereas mortality was not associated with need for explantation and clamp location. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm repair reflected increasing complexity over time, with the need for explantation among urgent repairs significantly on the rise. Urgency and clamp location independently predicted long-term mortality, even after adjustment for age. These findings underscore the changing landscape of open AAA repair in the current era.

Nationwide Analysis of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Portugal from 2000 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Results on the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from Mediterranean countries are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in rate of and mortality after repair of intact AAA (iAAA) in Portugal. METHODS: iAAA repairs registered in the hospitals' administrative database of the National Health Service from 2000 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed regarding demographics (age and gender) and type of repair (open surgery [OS] or endovascular repair [EVAR]). Rate and mortality were compared among three time periods: 2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2015. RESULTS: Age-standardized rate of iAAA repair increased consistently across the time periods under analysis from 3.6 ± 0.6/100,000/year in 2000-2004, to 5.6 ± 0.4/100,000/year in 2005-2009 and to 7.1 ± 0.9/100,000/year in 2010-2015 (P < 0.001). The percentage of EVAR among all iAAA repairs rose steeply from 0 to 21 ± 19% and then to 58 ± 7% (P < 0.001). The rate of OS also increased from the first to the second period, but there was a decrease in the third period (P < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality after iAAA repair decreased from 7.5 ± 1.3% to 6.6 ± 1.6% and then to 5.1 ± 1.9% (P < 0.001). This variation corresponded to a decrease in in-hospital mortality after EVAR (from 4.0 ± 3.5% to 2.8 ± 0.9%, P < 0.001) and increased in-hospital mortality after OS (7.5 ± 1.3% to 7.4 ± 1.1% to 8.3 ± 3.7%, P < 0.001). Low-volume centers (< 15 repairs/year) did not present higher mortality rates. The number of EVARs per year in a center presented a positive association with EVAR mortality (Spearman correlation of 0.696, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of repair of iAAA continues to grow, especially in patients aged ≥ 75 years and did not reach an inflection point yet. This is happening along with decreased repair mortality mainly because of the increased use of EVAR. Hospital mortality for iAAA repair is still a matter of concern, warranting further investigation and planning of vascular surgical services.